|Posted by Crayzon Deeyon on October 15, 2018 at 8:35 PM|
Is it me, or is the media discarding Michael Avenatti?
Wasn't it great? Wasn't the media salacious when reporting Avenatti's client's claims of a sexual encounter with, then, regular old businessman Donald Trump? Weren't they almost too zealous in their pursuit of stories concerning President 45, when he was a cheating businessman, and didn't Michael Avenatti fore fill that need?
Sure he did! He kept the stories coming, even to the point where 45's personal lawyer, through examination within the Mueller probe, brought partly by what Avenatti brought to light, cooperated with the probe, and is now indicted. Yes, Michael Avenatti was the media darling, the media had to have him on their various news shows-- Rachel, Jack Tapper, etc. But, what went wrong?
True indeed, what he brought forth shook even 45, who could deny, or even claim to be able to shoot a person, and still be elected. His (Avenatti's) witnessed accounts of misdeeds by 45 and his cohorts paid-out dividends, ratings gold-- sensational headlines, follow-up reporting months on end, on end, on end.
Donald Trump Beats Stormy Daniels Defamation Lawsuit
But I ask once more-- what went wrong? Could it be Avenatti made a miscalculation? Did he move and make a misstep? What happened, wasn't his information credible, vetted and used by the media? Yes, his information was credible, but within hubris, a person who has had success with what they bring to the masses, can many times build or be built-up for the fall, for displaying excessive pride in their confidence to continue to deliver.
Was it his declaration or his hint of a possible run for President 46, which made the media pump breaks on information Michael Avenatti provided during the Kavanaugh hearings? Or, was it the nervousness of the Democrats?
The Dems, those spineless, non-message having haters of their on party and party constituency. They say-- Trump is not a politician, but he sure is whooping their butts, getting everything the Republicans (Repubs) want passed. Able to talk to the usual suspects thought enemies of The State, without need of worry of being called a trader for negotiating with terrorists, or enemy States. Unlike President 44, he (45) was able to get an associated justice appointed to the supreme court, who was under accusations of sexual misconduct.
The Dems, the party of the so-called resistance-- is painted and is nothing more than a party of obstruction. The collective "leadership" have no new ideas, and they have no message, but to remain genteel while the Repubs impugn their character in hearings. So worried about gentility they (Pelosi & Schumer) dared to talked down on Maxine Waters, who spoke up and out about the so-called "resistance".
The Dems, who claim to be better politicians than Trump. The ones who say he's not qualified, due to not being a politician for years into decades; well there lies the problem with Michael Avenatti. Once he hinted at running for President, his usefulness, with the facts on Businessman Trump-- his usefulness became 'nuisance' when he, a non-politician, began to explore the presidency.
And, there, right there-- there where he hinted is where the decision to begin to ignore him began. He provided information, to the media, that could have helped the Democrats fight to right the Kavanaugh confirmation to, instead, desolvation-- where the support of Repubs would have been removed, leaving Kavanaugh's chances ended, but the Dems, in fear of a Democrat President, not coming from the career ranks of Democrat politicians, is why as a collective-whole, talking-points, the dems dismissed Avenatti's vetted 3rd Kavanaugh accuser.
Once the media heard the dems talk discredit of Michael Avenatti, the media outlets, who had once loved Avenatti's facts on Trump to salacious reporting, began to speak like the dems, and say the accuser of Kavanaugh, though vetted like Avenatti's Trump accuser, was not credible.
There is where the dems and the liberal as well as conservative media outlets have let down the American Citizen, as I close. Being in Washington DC, doing "the people's business", has become about only career politicians doing "the people's business"; and as long as the media is conservative or liberal leaning-- willing to be tools for the dems or the repubs, we will not have fair and balanced reporting-- when those, like 45, who are inconvenient for career politicians, can be silenced, with a dismissive word.
Did the media use and discard Michael Avenatti? Sure they did, and the reasons why are written above.